Compare · AI patent platform
Patent Radar vs Patlytics
Patent Radar ships the rights-holder workflow only and frames every output as a draft for legal review under UK Patents Act 1977 §70. Patlytics is broader and US-litigation-shaped.
Comparison verified 3 June 2026 against published material on patlytics.ai.
Side-by-side capability matrix
| Capability | Patent Radar | Patlytics |
|---|---|---|
AI patent infringement detection Verified 3 June 2026 at https://www.patlytics.ai/infringement-detection | ||
Claim chart generation Verified 3 June 2026 at https://www.patlytics.ai/claim-charts | ||
Invalidity analysis Patent Radar's wedge is monitoring; we do not currently ship an invalidity workflow. Verified 3 June 2026 at https://www.patlytics.ai/invalidity-analysis | ||
Trade-mark watching in the same dashboard Verified 3 June 2026 at https://www.patlytics.ai/ | ||
UK base + UK Patents Act §70 framing on every output Patlytics is US-headquartered. Verified 3 June 2026 at https://www.patlytics.ai/about | ||
Outputs explicitly labelled draft for legal review Verified 3 June 2026 at https://www.patlytics.ai/claim-charts |
Each row is sourced from published material on the linked page. A green tick means the vendor's own published surface describes the capability; a blank cell means we did not find it on their published surface as of 3 June 2026. If a row is out of date, email hello@patentradar.ai and we'll review.
Why this matters
Patlytics covers more of the litigation workflow (infringement + invalidity + chart drafting) and is well-funded. Patent Radar is narrower: monitoring plus draft charts, with the legal posture baked in, outputs labelled as drafts for review, never as enforcement artifacts. For a UK rights holder briefing UK counsel, the §70 strict-liability frame matters more than feature breadth.
When Patlytics is the better fit
Choose Patlytics if you are a US-based litigation or licensing team that wants invalidity + infringement coverage in one platform and is comfortable taking on the workflow design yourself. Patlytics' breadth across the patent-litigation lifecycle is genuine and the team is well-funded.
Pricing, like-for-like
Where a competitor does not publish list pricing, we say so and link to their request-a-demo page rather than guess. UK comparative-advertising rules require pricing comparisons to be like-for-like and verifiable; we will not publish a leaked or estimated figure here.
Next step
See what Patent Radar surfaces on your portfolio.
A 15-minute call with James. Custom quote in your inbox by end of the working day.
Disclaimer
Patent Radar is not affiliated with Patlytics. Patlytics and related product names are trade marks of their respective owners and used here purely for identification under TMA 1994 §10(6) and equivalent honest-comparison provisions. This comparison reflects published information on the linked pages as of 3 June 2026 and is made in good faith from public sources. Verify current details before purchase. Patent Radar makes no claim regarding the legal position of any product mentioned; capability rows describe published features only. If anything on this page is inaccurate, contact hello@patentradar.ai and we will correct or remove it.